JAMES Packer's $245 million raid on the Ten Network may be blocked because it would reduce competition for AFL broadcast rights.

And because two key shareholders have thrown their weight behind the casino king's plans to shake up the TV network, his 17.88 per cent stake will be treated as a controlling interest in a review by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.

I enjoy watching my football (AFL).

One of the most frustrating things, particularly in terms of broadcasting, is the fact I live in Western Australia, where, in most cases, AFL match broadcasts are shown delayed, or not shown at all.

If the lack of competition in the AFL broadcasting rights resulted in a better deal for the viewer, then, really, where is the problem? Surely broadcast rights are about providing viewers with the best possible outcome.

I am not so naive to understand this is business. There is a product, and it is being traded. I understand competition law. But. But we currently have a situation where there is no interest, no driver for anyone to truly take on a better broadcasting deal for the viewer.

Deals between the Foxtel group and commercial stations has not fixed it. The FTA services are not interested unless they meet critical mass in order to maintain advertising and viewer-ship. Come on ACCC open it up. It should be a free market for the likes of pay television to pick up where FTA is failing the viewer! Maybe its a good thing, maybe not. But the current model is not working for the consumer.

The issue here is not with Packer, Murdoch or the broadcasting services. The issue here is the AFL. It needs the money, sure, well let them pay for it! I do, I am willing and as a result of ACCC rules and the AFL I am left high and dry every season. That's my view, at least.

Sylvestor