You will pay - one way or another and you can't blame me!

Greens propose interim carbon tax
 - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

By Alexandra Kirk for AM

Posted Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:03am AEDT
Updated Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:17am AEDT

Smoke stacks with billowing clouds of smoke.

Interim scheme: The Greens want carbon to be priced at $20 a tonne for two years (freefoto.uk)

The Greens are attempting to break the political deadlock over emissions trading by suggesting an interim two-year scheme with a fixed price on carbon.

Greens Senator Christine Milne is writing to the Government and the Opposition proposing a carbon price of $20 a tonne.

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott will soon unveil his plan to cut greenhouse gases without a trading scheme or carbon tax and there is little, if any, prospect of the Government getting its legislation through the Senate.

Senator Milne says a temporary scheme would cut emissions by about 2 per cent and give political parties time to negotiate long-term targets.

"The Greens are proposing as an interim, two-year measure, starting in July this year, that we introduce a $20 carbon price. Now that is what Professor Garnaut argued when he released his report, saying that you could do this for an interim period.

"It would give us the breathing space to be able to negotiate a rigorous target, to negotiate some of the aspects of the emissions trading scheme that we don't agree with the Government on."

There is no global climate deal and the Federal Government's legislation appears doomed. Just before it is put to the Senate again, Mr Abbott will reveal how he would cut emissions without putting a price on carbon.

That would set the election battleground, but that is about all.

Senator Milne says someone has to get things moving.

"We are living currently in a political environment where nothing is happening in Australia in terms of a carbon price and our domestic emissions are rising," she said.

"Based on the modelling done to date, the Greens believe that [the carbon price] would halt the growth in emissions, turn it around and reduce emissions by a small amount, probably in the vicinity of 2 per cent."

The Greens say their plan would generate $5 billion to compensate households, with the same amount for renewable energy and energy efficiency.

Unlike Kevin Rudd's scheme, it would be in surplus from the start and there would be no compensation for the coal and electricity sectors and less assistance for high-emitting industries.

Senator Milne says she hopes Ross Garnaut, who was the Government's key climate change advisor, will endorse the strategy.

The Australian Government will not back-away from the fiasco that is 'climate-change'. Certainly it won't happen in the near future. So why, in the last ten years, has this topic become the issue of contention for ours and many other first-world-nations political agendas? Its all about money of course, it always is!

Whether or not you believe in said 'climate change', the whole shamozzle of the last three years, which has seen a laughable amount of money, tax-payer and not, a massive hypocrisy established (yes, fly 114 Aussies to Copenhagen for a farcical get-together), and the threat of world destruction unless we pay more money...umm..that one still stumps me!

Its business folks. Politics, business and money. Its always about politics, business and money. Wong may have the best interests of the climate and the planet in mind, but she doesn't have mine. Milne and Brown may feel that, as a 'Green' political party they must be seen to do something - and as the governing party wants taxation, of course they will follow suit - least path of resistance.

Well I resist.

Pricing carbon, even for the big-polluters, or taxing industry, simply shifts money around the economy. I end up paying more so that they can happily burn more Coal. And I promise you this, if you are like me...in a relationship, no children, relatively good income, no state-level financial support; you and I will be hit hard. We already are. Middle Australia will pay, and pay through the nose.

If our Government truly wanted to make a difference to GLOBAL warming - then why is our country embracing the multi-tens-of-billions of dollars in new contracts to supply the rest of the world with Coal and Natural Gas? Milne is disappointed, so where is your legislation to block this behaviour? Yep, you wouldn't dare!

Environmentally-friendly-politicians? I wouldn't want you to be my friend!

Don't accept responsibility unless you are responsible when next you offer your opinion on this whole farce. I am going out now to plant a few more trees...when did you last plant a tree Wong? Milne? Brown? Rudd? Abbott? Turnbull? Yeh right, give me a break!

Sylvestor

Comments (0)
Posted 1 month ago

PM plays co-host at climate talks, issues ultimatum

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has been a key participant at the United Nations summit on climate change. [AAP]
PHOTO

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has been a key participant at the United Nations summit on climate change. [AAP]

Sabra Lane

Last Updated: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 07:47:00 +1000

Australia's Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has issued an ultimatum to the country's opposition after playing a leading role at a forum on climate change at the United Nations.

Mr Rudd co-hosted a round-table discussion with 20 counties on the obstacles to a deal on climate change in December.

The talks ran for two hours and included China, South Korea and the Maldives.

Mr Rudd says there needs to be a deal between developed and developing countries.

"What the world needs is a grand bargain between the developed world and the developing world in order to reach an outcome for the planet as a whole," he said.

After the talks, Mr Rudd and climate change minister, Penny Wong, issued a October 19 deadline for the Federal Opposition to put forward its amendments on the Emissions Trading Scheme.

This story disappoints me.

And no, its not about my issues with emmissions trading or climate change.

This is our country's leader. Our Prime Minister. He has been in one of the spotlight's of the world, through the G20 and United Nations visit in New York this week.

It is unfortunate, in my opinio, that Rudd has used this as an opportunity for political grand-standing. Its not enough to just represent the interests of our nation to the world, but in his usual whim, point the finger back to local political issues my issuing this "ultimatum" to the Coalition.

What a crock! Grow up KRudd!

Sylvestor
www.twitter.com/Sylvestor

Comments (0)
Posted 5 months ago

Review: The Age of Stupid Gets Smart on Enviropocalypse | Underwire | Wired.com

The Age of Stupid

Blurring the boundary between sci-fi and documentary, Franny Armstrong’s The Age of Stupid peers back in time from a climate crisis-wracked 2055 to lament our current inaction on the mother of all conflicts: The war on terra. The film premieres globally on Monday.

“We’re not at war at the moment,” explains Piers Guy, a British wind-farm developer who serves as one of The Age of Stupid’s compelling subjects. “But if people actually recognized the full implications of what’s happening to us, they would be treating it like a war.”

Armstrong’s docu-film isn’t shy about examining those implications. Beginning with the Big Bang, The Age of Stupid’s evocative CGI hurls toward 2055 at light-speed, only to find Earth’s once-mighty metropoles annihilated. From a drowned London to a buried Las Vegas and a burning Sydney, its dystopian imagery conjures up disturbing visions of humanity and hyperconsumption gone seriously awry.

 

London drowns and Sydney burns in <em>The Age of Stupid</em>'s destabilizing dystopia.<br><em>All images courtesy Spanner Films</em>

London drowns and Sydney burns in The Age of Stupid's destabilizing dystopia. All images courtesy Spanner Films

Well, it might be a bit of hogwash - do we really think London will be flooded and Sydney burning in 2055? Seriously?? This movie - come - docudrama (errk!) really is just about putting fear into the voters so that their Governments react according to our Enviro-Economists in Copenhagen.

But since the special effects and CGI are meant to be awesome - why the hell not! Read more at wired.com's reviews section.

Sylvestor
www.twitter.com/Sylvestor

Filed under  //  Climate Change   Environment   Movies   Review   Underwire   Wired.com  
Comments (0)
Posted 5 months ago